Trevor PaughSystems engineer
Trevor PaughProject Chronicles

Chronicles / PermitBuzz

Where the data is, and how it may be taken

Progress

Of 22 North Carolina counties surveyed, eight publish machine-readable permit data and four are clearly usable at launch. The sourcing rule is official feeds and public-records requests only. No scraping.

A permit alert is only as good as its source, so the first real work was a survey of what counties publish.

The survey

Twenty-two North Carolina counties were checked for a machine-readable permit feed: an open-data portal, an API, a downloadable export, or a public-records process that yields one.

ResultCounties
Machine-readable feed exists8 of 22
Clearly usable at launch4
Uncertain1

The four usable ones cover Wake County and its municipalities as one bundle, Durham, Asheville, and Greensboro. Mecklenburg has data but its terms and format need a conversation before it can be relied on.

The sourcing rule

Official feeds and public-records requests only. No scraping of permit portals, even where it would be easy. The reasoning is partly legal and partly practical: a scraped source breaks silently when a portal changes, and a service that promises a daily digest cannot afford silent breaks. The legal side was reviewed in detail and stays in the project’s private notes.

The launch order

Wake first, because the bundle covers the most contractors. Then Greensboro. Then Mecklenburg, once permission is in hand.

Stack and providers

The same day settled the stack: Next.js with Supabase, chosen over a Django or a Cloudflare D1 build for the speed of getting a passwordless flow and a database up. Telnyx for SMS over the alternative considered. The whole thing costs a few dollars a month at zero subscribers.